mojavelinux.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the mojavelinux.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host mojavelinux.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Strategic Systems Consulting .

people.apache.org 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

mojavelinux.com : open source advocacy mojavelinux.com serves as a digital workplace for the thoughts, programs and ideas of an open source advocate, visionary and teacher, dan allen, so that they may be shared with the world. more » i'm speaking at überconf 2012, westminster, co skip navigation home about archives articles projects portfolio reading wiki contact seam in action translations january 02, 2012 a long overdue post, i'm still excited to share that seam in action was translated (in 2010) into korean and simplified chinese--two languages i can't even pretend to understand. it's pretty strange to see words that you spend countless hours revising look complete foreign to you. but exciting at the same time! these books arrived in a box that clearly looked like it came out of a shipping container that was aboard an ocean carrier. my goal is that sometime soon (2012 perhaps?) i'll get to travel to where these texts originated :) (but hopefully on an airplane). i have a whole stack of these books, so if you are in the dc area (or the us for that matter) and you want one of these books, just let me know. i'll mail it to you, free of charge. posted at 03:00 pm in seam in action | del.icio.us | digg | comments (5) open letter to the jcp executive committee calling for jcp reform november 01, 2010 seizing the opportunity of a new executive committee (ec) under a new regime , i'd like to issue a call for reform of the java community process (jcp) to allow it to produce more iterative and timely technology and live up to it's name as a "community process", rather than acting as the "corporate process" many believe it is today [1] . goals and current problems the goal and of this call to action parallels a statement made by mark little, cto of jboss and member of the ec, in response to questions for the 2010 ec candidates [2] . we believe that the ec still has an important role to play in the future of java, and working within the ec is the best place to push for change and improvements. java is certainly more "open" now than it was a decade ago, but it's not as open as [...] other standards bodies [omg, oasis, w3c and ietf]. we would like to see that change. indeed, the central problem with the current jcp is lack of transparency and openness. although the jcp defines itself as "the open, participative process to develop and revise the java technology specifications, reference implementations and test suites", it's not very open nor participative in practice. the community is almost entirely excluded when developing so called "open standards". the root cause of this problem is that the expert group (eg) mailinglists are not open to the public (save a few exceptions, notably jsr-303 and jsr-311). the mailinglists are where the bulk of the technology design takes place. the private mailinglists don't merely close the doors to the general public. eg members from one jsr can't even read the correspondence of another jsr. feedback is one directional, from community to eg. all the general public can see are the drafts of the jsrs. they don't know how the eg arrived at that draft, meaning they aren't able to study the discussions that went into it. the eg may reciprocate by publishing another specification draft, with or without the feedback incorporated. while companies and major java leaders are involved in the jcp, individuals from the java community have to really fight to be included or provide feedback. let us not forget the significance of their participation, as mark little points out. a strong jcp and a strong ec should be to the benefit of the entire java community and not just to a select few. the jcp also fails to respect the nature of software development. instead of following an iterative process, jsrs target big-bang releases that have no clear continuum to the next generation. these major shifts in the platform make it increasingly harder for consumers to carry out migrations. smaller releases would be easier to adopt. there are also huge lapses between releases, which is time for the technology to fall out of date. how can we expect to define a unified and consistent platform that integrates well if the technologies bundled are created in different campuses at different times? the decisions that occur behind close doors effectively turn off would be participants and consumers. the community becomes frustrated because they don't know what's going on. it's true that progress can emerge even from even a crippled process. there's no doubt that java ee has been experiencing a revival since the release of java ee 6, but with no clear target for ee 7, how long can the honeymoon last? bill burke cites how a small company like red hat has been able to make a big impact on the jcp standards [3] . he provides this evidence to make the point that the jcp is salvageable. great, so let's salvage it and get it moving again. the call for reform i propose that the jcp redefine itself as: "an open, community-oriented standards organization that produces standard technical specifications for java technology in order to keep it competitive and to bring value and choice to businesses worldwide. these goals are achieved by honoring the nature of software development, which means fostering a collaborative, evolutionary process where change of all types (addition, revision and deprecation) is inevitable and standards are snapshots in a timeline along that evolution. standards produced by this process are published under and open, non-clickthrough license, which applies to the specification documents, the apis, the reference implementations (ris) and the compatibility test suites (tcks). a fair voting system is used to maintain a balance of power and there is complete openness of process and membership. the goal of this organization, above all else, is to produce timely, iterative, high-quality standards, which means never standing in the way of progress nor precluding proposals or ideas that may lead to a better way forward." to make it very clear what changes i'm calling for, i've itemized them below, ranging from "must have" to "nice to have". must haves: specifications must be published under and open, non-clickthrough license, which covers the specification documents, the apis, the reference implementations and the compatibility test suites specifications should be free to use and implement (no tck fees) specifications must provide a non-clickthrough specification document, stored in an open vcs system and easily viewable online by anyone (a nightly build of the spec would be sufficient of the document is created by for-pay software) specifications should be required to publish api binaries, sources, and javadocs to maven central specifications must have public issue trackers, open source tcks and public mailinglists for all jsrs, and require information about these resources to be public and easy to find expert groups (egs) should not be automatically disbanded after a final release of a spec (maintenance releases are an extremely important part of a jsr's evolution) maintenance releases should be easier to initiate (and get approved); the software process should be iterative names of individual representatives, and the company they represent, should be listed on the specification page; it should be clear who the representatives are there should be an official process for deprecating or removing a technology; old technologies currently die a slow unused death, dragging the platform down, and leaving complexity in its wake as vendors are required to pass the tcks; let's not hide behind the term "pruning" all specification communication must be considered public, and should be archived, unless initiated privately by a member of the community for accessibility: specification documents should be made available in html format for easy web access; pdfs should merely be one viewing option, not the only one specifications should provide end-user, user-case driven doc

URL analysis for mojavelinux.com

http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/general/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/2009/04/30_certainly_was_something/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/articles/tutorials/speed_up_your_jsfbased_seam_application_by_two_orders_of_magnitude/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#content
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/2009/05/a_gamechanging_maven_2_plugin_you_absolutely_must_use/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#entry121
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#entry120
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#entry122
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/2010/06/dont_overlook_this_framework/#comments
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/technology/
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#ref5
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#ref4
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#ref7
http://www.mojavelinux.com/#ref6

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: MOJAVELINUX.COM
Registry Domain ID: 70012062_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2018-04-26T19:38:11Z
Creation Date: 2001-04-27T04:55:31Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-04-27T04:55:31Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS11.EAPPS.COM
Name Server: NS12.EAPPS.COM
Name Server: NS13.EAPPS.COM
Name Server: NS14.EAPPS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-02-09T17:47:57Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Gandi SAS

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =mojavelinux.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME mojavelinux.com

  CHANGED 2018-04-26

  CREATED 2001-04-27

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS11.EAPPS.COM 69.89.8.104

  NS12.EAPPS.COM 216.154.208.208

  NS13.EAPPS.COM 206.81.9.63

  NS14.EAPPS.COM 206.189.102.165

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .